Dignity for all Students and Their Health
Published: Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Updated: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 18:01
Boston College Students for Sexual Health (BCSSH) is committed to improving sexual health education and resources for all students at BC. We seek to foster dialogue and provide comprehensive information about sexual health, as well as to campaign for policy reform. We engage with the health of the whole person: emotional, social, environmental, physical, spiritual, and mental, in order to empower students to make informed and healthy decisions.
We do not do these things in spite of our place at a Jesuit institution, but in keeping with it. It is expressly because we have the privilege of attending a University so dedicated to the development of the self – both the body and the soul – that we find it both appropriate and necessary to advocate for these sexual health issues that are an integral aspect of that process. In that regard, we provide condoms and other resources directly to students, we run programming, such as Sex and the Soul, that explores the relationship between human sexuality and personal spirituality, and we work with the administration to understand the University's positions on these issues and push for policy reform in the best interest of the students. In short, BCSSH respects and works within the framework of BC's Catholic tradition, but we refuse to accept that it must invariably bar us from pursuing an open dialogue and concrete action around this issue. A University dedicated to fostering men and women for others simply cannot consider itself and the mission of protecting students' health mutually exclusive.
As an executive board member of BCSSH, these were the points I tried to discuss with a Jesuit and resident minister who we encountered during last Friday's condom distribution when he told me that my participation in the distribution was degrading to the dignity of both myself and other students, that it – the distribution and the act of protected, consensual sex itself – made any who participate less of a person and less human. He further elaborated that we female volunteers were making it easy for men to use us, as if sex were an inherently misogynistic act which a woman could not be empowered to pursue for herself, and in which there could not possibly exist mutual consent and respect.
Having never before been accused of degrading students' dignity, nor told I am less than human, I was taken aback by this attack on my freedom to educate students and my personal freedom in making informed decisions related to sexuality. Yet, what shocked me most was when he began to shout at students with whom we interacted. "You're better than that!" he would say to students who accepted condoms. And when a student declined our offer, he would laud them: "Good for you! You have dignity!"
As this interaction continued, I watched student after student appear to take interest in receiving sexual health resources, but shy away because of his comments. These students turned down life-saving health materials because they were intimidated by a University figure employed to support and guide them. Whether this was his intent, this Jesuit's actions directly infringed not just upon students' personal comfort, but also their very freedom to make decisions for themselves. In so doing, he jeopardized students' health and safety.
Is this the culture we want for our students – one of intimidation, fear, and judgment? BCSSH has always acted with respect, both in our approach to University administration and with regard to the student body, in whom we recognize a plurality of views and experiences. We acted respectfully toward our protester as well, inviting him to speak with us. The behavior we saw in return, however, was anything but respectful of students, their health needs, or their freedom of choice. BC should foster a community that empowers and supports its students to make healthy decisions for themselves, not one that judges or endangers them.
After last Friday's encounter, I am more than ever committed to the BCSSH mission. I realize just how great a need there is for open dialogue, a University culture more accepting of students' personal choices, and our efforts to promote students' ability to make those choices in a healthy manner. This Jesuit accused us of being "animals" who ignore the consequences of our actions. But BCSSH is here precisely because we know the consequences of a student body that is not provided adequate sexual health information and resources – like how, for example, one in four college students has a sexually transmitted infection. With that in mind, we cannot afford to judge or intimidate students. Our health and safety are too important.
Please consider this letter an open offer to the BC community to engage in conversation and meaningful dialogue. We hope that as a community we can respect students' rights to pursue choices about their health in a judgment-free environment. Human dignity and respect for the self means nothing without respect for others.
7 comments
2: Sex is for married folks only; unwed folks should abstain. (implied)Here's the skinny, folks: reverend Chris is deluded. He believes in the sanctity of marriage, and believes that anyone who has sex before marriage... well, shouldn't. That's just dandy and fantastic with me! I approve of his right to believe that 'til he's blue in the face. Problem is, THERE IS GOING TO BE UNWED SEX WHETHER YOU WANT THERE TO BE OR NOT. And his actions of goading, guilting and shaming students out of free condoms as described in the original article may have lead to someone who WOULD have had protected sex having UNPROTECTED sex.Biblical stories and values were set before most of the STDs and STIs today came around, so they didn't take into account the different uses and benefits for contraceptives and prophylactics. However, since people like reverend Chris are now espoused these values in a world that IS rife with STDs and STIs, this point is absolutely irrelevant. There needs to be an increase in sex education, MOSTLY FROM PARENTS, so that teenagers and young adults can know the facts about and options for and repercussions of having sex before they actually do. Abstinence only education and fear-mongering have NEVER WORKED in helping people make healthy decisions. All they do is suppress and demonize entirely natural desires and urges until a rash decision and/or scarring incident occurs. There's no way around the fact that being anti-condom is being anti-disease prevention. To insist that unwed people in their sexual prime shouldn't -- or worse, to believe that they DON'T -- have sexual contact of any kind is short-sighted and dangerous for the American public's welfare. This presumption plus its resulting mindset and actions are insane and irresponsible, and anybody who abides by them cannot call themselves a mentor to today's youth.Keone Zirkle
University of Hawai'i at Manoa graduate, c/o 2007
A great big Hooah to the Jesuit that stoood up to you and all those that were being tricked by your propaganda.
-Steve Curran
Local Online Marketing by LocalVox
is a member of the 

