Quantcast The Heights
College Media Network
 

 Edition

 
Mukasey spurs controversy at BC Law
Slated speaker for law school convocation rouses heated debate
By Patrick Gallagher
  • Print
  • Email
  • Page 1 of 1
Amid mixed reactions from faculty and students, on Jan. 23 the Boston College Law School announced that U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey will be speaking at the 2008 Law School commencement. With commencement just two months away, nearly two dozen faculty members have made a final plea to the administration and to the Attorney General's office that Mukasey not speak at the event.

"A commencement speaker is rather different than someone coming to speak on a matter of public interest - a commencement speaker is someone held up to the students and the world as an embodiment of the school," said James Rogers, a professor at BC Law School. "It strikes me as very problematic that the school has invited a commencement speaker who refuses to acknowledge that waterboarding is a form of torture."

On March 11, Rogers and 21 other faculty members sent a petition to Mukasey's office, respectfully requesting that he withdraw his offer to speak at the commencement on May 23. Copies of the signed letter were also forwarded to Dean of BC Law School John Garvey and University President Rev. William P. Leahy, S.J.'s office.

The petition read, "We realize that you face complex professional difficulties in your position as Attorney General. We are very concerned, however, that your role in the current controversy regarding the legality of waterboarding has made you a symbol of Administration policies that conflict with basic principles of international and domestic law, the ideals of Boston College Law School, and the Jesuit principles that underlie Boston College's educational mission."

Speaking on the controversial waterboarding technique that has been used as a method of interrogation by the U.S. government, Rogers said, "That's one
Page 1 of 1

Article Tools

Viewing Comments 1 - 6 of 6

BrehonOD

Jim O'Donnell BCLaw 1978

posted 3/27/08 @ 12:34 PM EST

I commend the faculty, as opposed to the administration, of the Law School for speaking out about the selection of a commencement speaker whose actions before Congress belittle and belie the function for which lawyers are trained - to seek the truth. (Continued…)

greenhaba

Tom L

posted 3/27/08 @ 2:54 PM EST

It's ok to have commencement speakers that support the premeditated barbaric murder of unborn children but let's not have speakers who might support scaring terrorists, who have killed thousands and who could save thousands, into thinking they are going to die. (Continued…)

Ryan Brown '06

posted 4/01/08 @ 1:41 PM EST

I have to agree with Tom L. Everytime anyone remotely conservative comes as a commencment speaker (remember Secretary Rice at my graduation?) the super liberal members of the faculty throw a fit. (Continued…)

JohnLopresti

JohnLopresti

posted 5/26/08 @ 12:54 PM EST

We are still reviewing the Attorney General's remarks. His presentation is at its best when imbued with his delightfully acerbic NYC humor, but, like Youngstown Sheet + Tube's sliding scale perigee, at its nadir when proposing recitation of historical facts. (Continued…)

buy tramadol c.o.d.

posted 8/31/08 @ 3:52 AM EST

I like articles like this. Great Article! Thanks!

Casino EspaƱa

posted 9/26/08 @ 7:02 AM EST

Commencement speakers, particularly politicians, frequently stir opposition on college campuses. In 2006, hundreds of Boston College students protested the invitation of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice. (Continued…)

Post a Comment

  • NOTE: Email address will not be published

Type your comment below (html not allowed)

  I understand posting spam or other comments that are unrelated to this article will cause my comment to be flagged for deletion and possibly cause my IP address to be permanently banned from this server.

Advertisement

Poll

What fall show are you most excited about this year?
Submit Vote

View Results

Advertisement