Joshua Holtz responds to Ryan Duffy’s Column “A GOP in Jeopardy”
LTE: Tough Truths and the BC History Core: A Response to “Students’ Petition Calls for Changes in the Core”
“A number of departments have taken significant steps over the past decade to rectify the pedagogical injustice about which the students legitimately complain.”
LTE: A Response to “Learning Respect, One Scoop at a Time”
“As a senior, I will be pleased if our Commencement speaker is half as insightful as Valerie’s op-ed.”
LTE: A Response to “The End of Democracy”
“Though I have no desire to get myself again entangled in something like the relentless back-and-forth inspired by my LTEs on race issues earlier this year, Mr. Behrens’s piece is so extraordinary that I can’t help but write.”
LTE: A Response to “Sixteen Minutes at Stokes”
“If this were a flash mob, if we decided to lie in the snow for the Vine, no one would care. But if we do it because we’re passionate about a civil rights issue, because we care about social justice … suddenly it’s against University policy?”
LTE: A Response to “Don’t Let Fear Cast Your Vote”
“Our world may not go up in smoke tomorrow, but it will go up in flames in the future if we don’t change our ways.”
LTE: A Response to “BC Faculty Donated Exclusively to Democratic Campaigns in 2014-15”
“I guess freedom of thought is alive and well at BC, as long as the freedom of thought supports the Democratic Party.”
LTE: A Response to “Why the Right Must Stop Trump”
A Response to “Why the Right Must Stop Trump”
LTE: A Response to the Election Committee’s Decision
Although the Elections Committee (EC) claims to be an unbiased, nonpartisan group, its decision to limit the UGBC election to two teams is clearly inspired by Bernie Sanders’ argument that “you don’t necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants.”
LTE: A Response Regarding UGBC Debate Changes
“With this in mind, we recommend that the Elections Committee continues to allow student leaders in ALC and GLC to ask questions at the debate. This is not about giving these groups special privileges—it is about ensuring there is equal and adequate representation in the debate.”